DANIEL 5


The last night of the great Babylonian Empire.



Chapter 5 describes the last night of the great Babylonian Empire. Daniel is now an old man over 80, and the king is Belshazzar, who is apparently the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar. This chapter was long used by critics in an attempt to discredit the Bible, for it did not fit in with the fanciful legends of heathen historians. The critics said there was and could be no such king - no such circumstances, but archeology has completely justified the Bible account.

This destruction of literal Babylon by Cyrus is typical of the destruction of symbolic Babylon by Christ. Even as the enemy surrounds the city, King Belshazzar, confident of this power and defenses, (verse 1) makes a great feast unto his lords, and in their drunken revelry (verse 3) he makes sport of the holy vessels of the temple, drinking to their own heathen gods out of them. So the Babylonian Harlot is drunken with the blood of the saints, and all nations are drunken with the wine of her fornication and follow all her customs and festivals. He says, "I sit a queen and am no widow," at the very time that her destruction strikes.

Suddenly, (verse 5) Belshazzar's merriment is silent, and the revelers are struck with terror by the appearance of the fingers of a man's hand, writing on the wall. The king (verse 7) calls for all his wise men and offers great honour to any who can interpret the supernatural message.

Daniel is not at this time in public prominence, but his fame is well known. The queen reminds Belshazzar of him, and Daniel is called (verse 11). And he spells out the meaning of the divine message (verse 25) - MENE, MENE, TEKEL, UPHARSIN. Numbered, numbered, weighed, and divided. The handwriting is clearly on the wall today. But the blind nations cannot read it. In that night (verse 30) was Belshazzar slain, and Darius, the Mede, took the kingdom.

Bro Growcott



Belshazzar the king


— One time it was very strongly denied that Belshazzar was ever king. Sayce stated: "Belshazzar never became king in his father's place"'.

Driver wrote: "In point of fact, Nabonidus was the last king in Babylon; he was a usurper, not related to Nebuchadnezzar, and one Belsharuzur is mentioned as his son".

The conclusion is that Daniel erred in calling Belshazzar "king" and son of Nebuchadnezzar. In dispensing with those criticisms, Babylonian inscriptions that archaeologists have since found completely confirm Daniel's description of the relationship of all the parties referred to in this chapter. They show that Nabonidus had a son identified with Belshazzar, and

that when he took up residence at Teima in North Africa, he left Belshazzar in charge of the northern frontier of the Babylonian empire.

Thus Belshazzar became the de facto king of Babylon as regent in the absence of his father.

... In several building inscriptions, Nabonidus associated Bel-shar-usur, whom he describes as his "firstborn", with himself in such a way as to indicate that he took an active part in the government as coregent. But does the relationship between Nebuchadnezzar and Belshazzar (that of father and son) as described in this chapter (see v.2) conform to fact? Or was Driver right in stating that Nabonidus, the father of Belshazzar, had no relationship with Nebuchadnezzar?

Archaeology has proved that Daniel was right and Driver was wrong. First, the terms "father" and "son", as used in such a context, do not necessarily denote a blood relationship. In ancient times, a king was treated and addressed as the "father" of the nation, and the respect or honour that was paid to such was that due to a parent. But there

was probably a much closer relationship.

It is pointed out by some that Neriglissar, the predecessor of Nabonidus, married the daughter of Nebuchadnezzar in order to lay claim to the throne, and then arranged for the assassination of the dissolute Evil-Merodach (2 Kings 25:27; Jer. 52:31), to grasp the throne for himself. In doing so, it is believed that he established a precedent that Nabonidus followed, and that he also married a daughter of Nebuchadnezzar to legitimise his claim to

the throne.

This conforms with the requirements of Scripture. Jeremiah predicted that 

"all the nations shall serve him (Nebuchadnezzar) and his son, and his son's son until the very time of his land come" (Jer. 27:7).

Now, in Scripture the word for "son" does duty also for "grandson" completely reconciling the prophecy of Jeremiah with the facts recorded by Daniel in this chapter. It will be noted that the margin renders "son" as "grandson".

The Christadelphian Expositor



1 Belshazzar the king made a great feast to 1 000 of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand.

This was apparently an annual festival with a religious significance. It was a time of public rejoicing when the whole city was given over to a night of revelling. According to Herodotus, Cyrus, king of Persia knew of this and took advantage of the occasion.

Bro GE Mansfield



Belshazzar (Bel Protect the King) evidently believed that the defences of Babylon made it impervious to attack, and that being under the special protection of the Babylonian god Bel who, he believed, was powerful to save, he could face disaster with impunity.

In those mistaken ideas, he gave himself over to pleasure and abandonment. The modern world does likewise, but as Babylon was brought to ruin, so also will it.

Cyrus diverted the course of the River Euphrates, and along the dry bed of the river which flowed through the city, his warriors were led to attack and overthrow it.

In Revelation 16: 15-16 these historical details are used as the basis of the symbology

of the Sixth Vial that describes the "drying up of the River Euphrates" that

"the way of the Kings of the East might be prepared",

through whom Babylon the Great will be judged and destroyed.

It is believed that Belshazzar's feast was an annual religious festival, a time of public

rejoicing during which the whole night was given up to hedonistic revelling. The historian Herodotus states that Cyrus knew of this, and took advantage οf it to attack the city. This night of feasting was predicted by Isaiah (Ch. 21: 4-5) and (Ch. 50:24; 51:39,57).

Isaiah described the reaction of the king at the writing on the wall:

"My heart panted, tearfulness affrighted me: the night of my pleasure hath He turned into fear unto me. . ."

Jeremiah prophesied:

' in their heat I will make their feasts, and I will make them drunken, that they may rejoice, and sleep a perpetual sleep and not wake, saith Yahweh. . ."

"I will make drunk her princes, and her wise men her captains, and her rulers and her mighty men: and they shall sleep a perpetual sleep, and not wake, saith the King whose name is Yahweh of hosts."

Belshazzar's feast anticipated the hedonism, the drunken and excessive revelry and blasphemy of peoples at the Time of the End. Inebriated by the wine of Babylon, they will not be able to reason clearly nor act coherently. Their madness will draw them along a course that will ultimately prove disastrous, leading to Armageddon. The feast surely anticipates the rejoicing of Rome at her seeming successful efforts to revive Papal power at the Time of the End (see Rev. 18:3,7):

"She saith in her heart, I sit a queen; and am no widow, and shall see no sorrow".

The Christadelphian Expositor




2 Belshazzar, whiles he tasted the wine, commanded to bring the golden and silver vessels which his father Nebuchadnezzar had taken out of the temple which was in Jerusalem; that the king, and his princes, his wives, and his concubines, might drink therein.

Daniel is now an old man over 80, and the king is Belshazzar, who is apparently the grandson of Nebuchadnezzar. This chapter was long used by critics in an attempt to discredit the Bible, for it did not fit in with the fanciful legends of heathen historians. The critics said there was and could be no such king - no such circumstances, but archeology has completely justified the Bible account.

This destruction of literal Babylon by Cyrus is typical of the destruction of symbolic Babylon by Christ. Even as the enemy surrounds the city, King Belshazzar, confident of this power and defenses, (verse 1) makes a great feast unto his lords, and in their drunken revelry (verse 3) he makes sport of the holy vessels of the temple, drinking to their own heathen gods out of them. So the Babylonian Harlot is drunken with the blood of the saints, and all nations are drunken with the wine of her fornication and follow all her customs and festivals. He says, "I sit a queen and am no widow," at the very time that her destruction strikes.

Bro Growcott - Daniel, The Man Greatly Beloved



6 Then the king's countenance was changed, and his thoughts troubled him, so that the joints of his loins were loosed, and his knees smote one against another.

But how this vain-glorious monarch trembled when he saw the hand inscribing the doom of his dynasty upon the wall! He that drank to the praise of his gods out of the gold and silver vessels of the temple, and "lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven," was seized with the pallor and prostration of extreme fear. But the Lord whom he had defied had numbered his kingdom and finished it; he had weighed him in the balances and found him wanting; and had therefore divided his kingdom to the Medes and Persians.

-Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come, Jan 1852



The Wise Men of Babylon

(Magicians, Astrologers, Chaldeans, and Soothsayers).

The three great branches of religious science (in Babylonia)—astrology, incantation, and divination—were represented by three corresponding classes of "wise men," all belonging in different degrees to the priesthood—the star-gazers, or astrologers, the magicians, or sorcerers, and the sooth-sayers or fortune-tellers (Dan. 5:7:11; 2:2; Isa. 47:13).

The latter again, were divided into many smaller classes according to the particular kind of divination which they practised. Some specially devoted themselves to the interpretation of dreams, others to that of the flight of birds, or of the signs of the atmosphere, or of casual signs and omens generally. All were in continual demand, consulted alike by kings and private persons, and all proceeded in strict accordance with the rules and principles laid down in the three great works of King Sarjon's time.

When the Babylonian empire ceased to exist, and the Chaldeans were no longer a nation, these secret arts continued to be practised by them, and the name "Chaldean" became a by-word, a synonym for "a wise man of the east"—astrologer, magician, or soothsayer. They dispersed all over the world, carrying their delusive science with them, practising and teaching it, welcomed everywhere by the credulous and superstitious, often highly honoured, and always richly paid.

Thus it is from the Chaldeans and their predecessors (the Shumiro-Accads) that the belief in astrology, witchcraft, and every kind of fortune-telling has been handed down to the nations of Europe, together with the practices belonging thereto, many of which we find lingering even to our day among the less-educated classes.

The very words "magic" and "magician" are probably an inheritance of that remotest of antiquities. One of the words for priest on the old Turanian tongue of Shumir (Shinar) was imga, which in the later Semitic language became mag.

The "Rabmag" (Jer. 39:3), "great priest," or perhaps, "chief conjuror," was a high functionary at the court of the Assyrian kings. Hence "magus," "magic," "magician," in all the European languages, from the Latin down wards.

There can be no doubt that we have little reason to be grateful for such an heirloom as this mass of superstitions (largely represented in the tablets discovered), which have produced so much evil in the world, and still occasionally do mischief enough.

—E. G.

The Christadelphian, Jan 1889



22 And thou his son, O Belshazzar, hast not humbled thine heart, though thou knewest all this;

'...when a man by the utmost use of skill and energy has secured any result he may aim at, the door is shut against personal pride or boast, because of the fact brought under Belshazzar's notice by Daniel when he said, God thou hast not glorified, in whose hand thy breath is and whose are all thy ways. '

An able successful man acts the part of a barbarian when he carries himself with arrogance and unmercifulness. Modesty, mercy to the lowly, and thanksgiving, are not only ornamental to prosperity, but they are the inevitable outcome of common reason.

Ways of Providence Ch 15.



26 This is the interpretation of the thing: MENE; God hath numbered thy kingdom, and finished it.

The world is passing away, and the fashion thereof


 Daniel was in "the realm of the Chaldeans." That realm was at the time the seat of empire throughout the civilised world. Babylon was the greatest of cities-greater in relation to the world at large than London is at the present time - greater in her imperial consequence-greater in her architectural wonders - greater in topographical extent - greater perhaps in her population - a city of mighty walls, of military greatness, of princely pomp and commercial importance and prosperity.

Where is all this greatness? Where is all the glory and the bustle and the prosperity? Go to the banks of the Euphrates today and receive the answer in the wilderness of rubbish mounds that stretch away in miles of silent desolation where great Babylon used to be. What shall we say to this but that

"the purpose of the Lord standeth sure";

for was it not written centuries before even Daniel's day:

"Babylon, the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of the Chaldees' excellency, shall be as when God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah. It shall never be inhabited, neither shall it be dwelt in from generation to generation . . . but wild beasts of the desert shall lie there; and their houses shall be full of doleful creatures" (Isa. 13:19).

The same word has decreed that God will make a full end of all the nations among whom He has scattered Israel (Jer. 30:11), that the time will come when the haughtiness of man throughout the whole earth shall be humbled, and when the Lord alone shall be exalted, and when the whole earth shall be turned into the inheritance of the meek, the habitation of immortals, and the house of Yahweh's praise (Isa. 2:11; Psa. 37:9; Rev. 21:4; Hab. 2:14).

This will as assuredly come to pass as the passing away of Babylon's glory, and we shall live to rejoice in the mighty change, if meanwhile we honour Yahweh in the reverence and obedience of His word.

Seasons 1.89.


The handwriting is clearly on the wall today. But the blind nations cannot read it.

Bro Growcott - Daniel, The Man Greatly Beloved



28 PERES; Thy kingdom is divided, and given to the Medes and Persians.

This was the Medo-Persian dynasty of "the old serpent". It answered to the second of Daniel's four beasts; and is represented in Nebuchadnezzar's Lion-Man image by the breast and arms of silver; and by the two horns of unequal height upon the ram (Dan. 2:32; 8:3).

The old serpent continued under the Bear, or silver, dynastic manifestation some two hundred and six years. Another change was then developed. Power set in from the west, and diffused itself "over the face of the whole earth. "

Eureka 12.14.



I will ascend unto heaven - Belshazzar

...how this vain-glorious monarch trembled when he saw the hand inscribing the doom of his dynasty upon the wall! He that drank to the praise of his gods out of the gold and silver vessels of the temple, and "lifted himself up against the Lord of heaven," was seized with the pallor and prostration of extreme fear.

But the Lord whom he had defied had numbered his kingdom and finished it; he had weighed him in the balances and found him wanting; and had therefore divided his kingdom to the Medes and Persians. Nor was he long in executing that night he was slain, and

"cast out as an abominable branch—as a carcase trodden under feet."

Now, let it be observed that the effect of the fall of "the Assyrian," and the acquisition of supreme power by Koresh, or Cyrus, was a proclamation throughout all his kingdom, saying

"The Lord God of heaven hath given me all the kingdoms of the earth; and he hath charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem which is in Judah..."

This Koresh, we doubt not, was a representative man. His name, the part he played in the overthrow of the Assyrian and the restoration of the Jews, and the things which the Lord uttered concerning him, are strongly evidential that he was a typical person.

His name Koresh is compounded of the prefix k, pronounced kar, signifying comparison or resemblance, namely, as, as if, like; and the noun yoraish heir. Kah-yoraish "like the heir," contracted into Koresh, because of certain rules in the pointing with which it would be useless to trouble the reader.

It is to be remembered here that about 185 years before the fall of Babylon Yahweh gave the name of Like-the-Heir to the Persian who overthrew the Assyrian and delivered Israel. He says concerning him,

"For Jacob my servant's sake, and Israel mine elect, I have even called thee by thy name; I have surnamed thee, though thou hast not known me."

He also says of him,

"He is my Shepherd, and shall perform all my pleasure; even saying to Jerusalem, thou shalt be built; and to the temple, Thy foundation shall be laid."

Then again he styles him "his Anointed," that is, his Christ. Can it be imagined that all these expressions found their full signification in the Persian Conqueror? No, we conclude rather that Yahweh named him Like-the-Heir, because he was to enact a similar part in regard to the first Babylon to that predetermined for Yahweh's Anointed Shepherd, "the Heir," [Matt 21: 38] in respect to the last.

The Persian was therefore officially like him. Each Babylonish dominion, the ancient and the modern, require a destroyer, Cyrus smote the former on the Head; Christ in smiting the latter on the feet will also abolish the head; Cyrus proclaimed the return of Israel; so will Christ "in the day of the great slaughter" when "he shall cause his glorious voice to be heard, and shall shew the lighting down of his arm," and "he shall beat down the Assyrian who smote with a rod:"

Cyrus laid the foundation of the temple; Christ, "the man whose name is the Branch * * shall build the temple of the Lord:" all the kingdoms of the earth were given to Cyrus; so also hereafter the kingdoms of this world are to become Yahweh's and his Christ's. These are not accidental analogies. Well, therefore, may the Persian be styled "Like the Heir," for the work appointed for each to do is as relative as the substance and the shadow.

Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come, Jan 1852


30 In that night was Belshazzar the king of the Chaldeans slain.

The fall of Babylon typified the impending destruction of Babylon the Great. Daniel would have heard Jeremiah's prophecy read at Babylon (Jer. 51:59-64).

31 And Darius the Median took the kingdom, being about threescore and two years old.

While Babylon had been indulging in a party atmosphere, the kings from the east (the Medo-Persians) were diligently preparing to occupy the city. They had diverted the waters of the Euphrates, until they were able to access the river-course which ran through the city.

Remarkably one of the great brazen gates in the bank of the Euphrates as it went through the city was left unlocked, and allowed the Persians to enter the city, taking control and removing the government of Babylon.

The Apocalypse chapter 16 is based on this incident. See verse 12.

Instead of the Medes and Persians, the "kings of the east" represent the saints from the sun's rising, who will overtake Babylon the Great, and bring about the occupation of the city of the Gentiles. The Mysterious Hand appeared on the walls of Belshazzar's palace (v. 5). This seems to be associated with the cherubim, for under their wings were hidden the hand of a man (Eze. 1:8). This hand gave Ezekiel the little scroll (ch. 2:9), and was with the prophet guiding him in his work (ch. 8:3).

Ezekiel was a contemporary of Daniel, and would have co-operated with him in upholding the Truth in the last days of the Gentile Babylonian times.

Bro GE Mansfield


www.logos.org.au