1 CORINTHIANS 2
The Cross at Corinth
The death and resurrection of Christ constitute the foundation of the whole scheme of salvation.
But the form and frequency with which the doctrine may be presented is a question of circumstances. Paul had a good reason for giving the cross a prominent place among the Corinthians. They were surrounded by a system of philosophy which made a future life an affair of "virtue."
The Platonists taught the immortality of the soul, and a happy disembodiment to those who lived righteously, according to philosophic conceptions. Paul taught the mortality of man under the divine law, and Christ, crucified and raised, as the only possible means of future immortality.
Paul and "the wisdom of this world," as exemplified in the doctrine of the Grecians, were at direct issue on the point that brought the death of Christ into prominence.
In the circumstances of the Corinthians, it was the most natural declaration of his attitude to say that among them he would know nothing; but (1) "Jesus Christ and (2) him crucified;" that is, he would know nothing but "the things concerning the kingdom of God (symbolised by the name Jesus Christ), and the things concerning his name," as a means of salvation.
He refused to recognise "philosophy and vain deceit," that imported "virtue" into the question, as determining a man's future destiny.
He adhered rigidly to the truth of God, which had for its centre and foundation, the fact that Christ had died and risen again. But he did not exclude the fact that Christ, who had thus died, was the king of Israel, and future ruler of the world. Orthodox religion does this.
It excludes the kingdom of God, and sets the Bible against itself. It makes Paul in his letters, teach that what he preached in his evangelistic journeyings, was unnecessary (Acts xx: 25; xxviii: 32).
When the truth is understood in its entirety, all its elements have a Scriptural place-the kingdom not eclipsing the cross, and the cross not overshadowing the kingdom.
The Christadelphian, March 1898
13 Which things also we speak, not in the words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the holy spirit teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
It is of importance that Paul's authority and reliability be realised. God bare him witness-it is upon this that our assurance concerning the infallibility of his teaching may rest. To question Paul is to insult God. This is involved in the apostle's claims:-
"We speak not in words which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the holy spirit teacheth (1 Cor. ii.13.)-"I command, yet not I, but the Lord" (1 Cor. vii.10.)-
"If any man think himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let him acknowledge that the things that I write unto you are the commandments of the Lord" (1 Cor. xiv. 37.)-
"As God is true, our word was not yea and nay" (2 Cor. i. 18)
-"We are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ" (2 Cor. ii. 17)-"For though I should boast somewhat more of our authority, which the Lord hath given us for edification, and not for your destruction, I should not be ashamed" (2 Cor. x. 8)-"If I come again, I will not spare since ye seek a proof of Christ speaking in me" (2 Cor. xiii. 3)
-"Now the things which I write unto you, behold before God, I lie not" (Gal. i. 20)-"Stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle" (2 Thes. ii. 15.)
What unspeakable comfort springs from the fact that we have such a guide! How assuring for poor, hesitating, fallible man! Paul's writings may be received with the simplicity of a child-without reservation and question.
What a contrast between these writings and the productions of ordinary men!
Bro AT Jannaway
The Christadelphian, Feb 1887. p66
14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
They are entirely out of the realm of the natural. The two cannot be reconciled, any more than two people can carry on a conversation who do not
know each other's language. They have nothing in common. Between them there is a great gulf fixed.
The world, man in his natural state, all his wisdom, all his knowledge, all his science, all his learning, all his accomplishment-are NOTHING. That is Paul's basis. There is no arguing
the point. There is no debate over the merits and claims of such things as evolution, or any other elaborate theory of man's invention.
The whole thing is dismissed with one word-FOLLY.
"the world by wisdom KNEW NOT GOD" (1 Cor. 1:21).
And this is equally true today.
"The FEAR OF THE LORD is the BEGINNING of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding" (Prov. 9:10).
The wisdom of the world is in many respects profound, but to all practical purposes it is useless, because it knows not God. It does not come to grips with the basic realities of life. The one important fact in the universe-the existence and revelation of God-it either denies or ignores.
On every other subject it has assembled vast multitudes of facts and even vaster multitudes of fancies. But to what end? What if one man could gather within his own mind all the world's wisdom, what good would it be to him when the time came to yield his breath?
But if he faithfully lays hold of the simple elements of GOD'S wisdom, eternity is his.
"The Jews," Paul says (1 Cor. 1:22), "require a sign; the Greeks seek after wisdom." They lay down their own conditions. They are the authorities. Their questions must be answered. And any revelation, to be considered by them, must conform to their conceptions. "Science"-that magic word!-"Science" says so and so. Nothing that contradicts it dare even be given serious attention.
This is why the teaching of these first two chapters is so important. With one sweep it strips "Science" of all its bluster and pretensions, and reveals it standing in naked shame at the pitiful little "mind of the flesh," blind to all eternal realities.
A discussion of science on its own merits is fatal, because it is endless. There is so much truth and so much error interwoven, so much factt and so much speculation inseparably entwined. But it all belongs to a passing order.
"The fashion of this world passeth away (1 Cor. 7:31). Where the mind of man and the mind of God conflict, we do not argue, we simply choose. Saving truth, the knowledge that brings life, is in a different category altogether. Worldly knowledge is of no assistance in acquiring this, but rather the reverse. This is spiritually discerned-it is learned through the medium of a meek and humble and Godly lowliness of mind, and NO OTHER WAY.
Bro Growcott - Ye are Full
16 For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.
God's ways are not man's ways. They are usually the very OPPOSITE of man's ways. To the eyes of man's wisdom they are incomprehensible foolishness. The mind of the flesh cannot understand them.
Do we have the mind of the flesh, or the mind of the Spirit?
Do we think naturally and animally according to "common sense," as all the world does, or do we perceive the utter falseness of all natural thoughts?
Bro Growcott - 'In Labours more Abundant'.