1 PETER 2
Enter subtitle here
5 Ye also, as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ.
Thus, "the Deity dwelleth not in temples," or "churches," "made with hands," but in a Holy Temple built by the formative power of the truth understood, believed, and obeyed. Every stone of this temple is living, and precious, and bought at the high price of the blood of Jesus Christ. Peter says, they are "lively stones built up a spiritual house," or temple (1 Pet. ii. 5; and in 2 Cor. vi. 16), Paul repeats the idea, saying to the true believers,
"Ye are the temple of the living Deity."
After such plain and pointed declarations as these, no one being acquainted with them, and comprehending them, can possibly believe, that the temples of the "religious world," whether the term be affirmed of a name, or denomination, or of all names and denominations collectively, or of cathedrals, churches, chapels, and conventicles, -- are temples of the Deity. These are none of his buildings. The impress of his workmanship is upon none of them; and therefore in none of them doth he reside, either by the truth, or spiritual gift.
The temples styled by the clericals "Houses of God," are what Daniel's prophecy denominates mivtzahrai mahuzzim, "Bazaars of the Guardians" (xi. 38-39); or ecclesiastical edifices dedicated to angels and the ghosts of saints, which are regarded in the mystery of spiritual sorcery, as "guardian spirits," or protectors of those who honour them.
In these church-bazaars are deposited "sacred" images and pictures of "saints." They are Demon-Temples, wherein are placed shrines for the repose of relics, supposed to have belonged to the demon, or ghost, when a dweller upon earth; also silver, gold, and ivory crucifixes; old bones, and divers junk-store odds and ends, and various kinds of votive trumpery.
They are literally "dens of thieves," without ever having been houses of the Father -- dens where people are robbed of their money under divers false pretences. They are places where pews are sold by auction, the proudest sittings being knocked down to Mammon's greatest favorites; places where fairs of vanity and deceit are beheld for "pious objects;" and where spiritual empirics pretend to "cure souls" in consideration of so much per annum.
In view of these facts, the scriptural epithet bestowed upon the ecclesiastical edifices of the Apostasy is most appropriate. They are truly Bazaars of spiritual merchandize; and the prospering craft, "the great men of the earth" made rich by trading in their wares, are the Bazaar-men who extort all kinds of goods from their customers by putting them in fear, and comforting them with counterfeits upon some fictitious bank in the world to come.
Now these sacrifices have to be offered both in the Altar-Court and in the Holy Place, where are the Bread and the Wine, and the ministry of the word, prayer, praise, and fellowship. As a community of priests, the faithful come together on the First Day of the Week, and in their session are manifested as a Heavenly; as a Holy Place; as the Tabernacle of the Testimony, "showing forth the praises of Him, who hath called them out of darkness into his marvellous light" (ver. 9).
In their ministrations and worship they stand, as it were an angel at the altar in the court, with the golden frankincense bowl of prayer. They are themselves this golden bowl, in which is much incense of prayers and praises, which they offer upon the golden altar. Their petitions and thanksgiving are kindled into odors of acceptable perfume by the fire taken from the altar of the court; and as constituents also of the golden altar of the Holy Place, the perfumes ascend before the Deity as it were out of the angel's hand.
The Psalms are peculiarly Israel's songs; they were never intended for the use of the alien; they are as exclusive as the Epistles of Paul.
In their composition they are essentially Israelitish. It is from the standpoint of Israel's hope alone that they can be rightly interpreted and appreciated. The Psalms comprise hymns of praise to God and hymns for the mutual edification and comfort of His people. However instructive these Psalms may be to those out of Christ, the enlightened must not wilfully allow them to be misapplied.
God is pleased with praise only when it has been preceded by obedience, and He accepts the service of exhortation from those only who have previously directed their own feet unto wisdom's paths (Matt. vii. 5).
"Ye (said Peter to believers), as lively stones, are built up a spiritual house, an holy priesthood, to offer up spiritual sacrifices, acceptable to God by Jesus Christ" (1 Pet. ii. 5). -ATJ
9 But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light:
The sealed servants of the Deity are always exclusive; for, being enlightened by the word and ruled by its principles, their liberality, toleration, and charity, transcend not the line which they describe --
"to the law and the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them."
Tried by this rule, they found the whole world condemned except themselves, and boldly and bravely proclaimed the truth.
13 Submit yourselves to every ordinance of man for the Lord's sake: whether it be to the king, as supreme;
It is impossible that a Christadelphian can be a patriot or a soldier. "Christian patriotism" is an invention of the flesh. It is one of the "good words and fair speeches" by which the simple are deceived.
The political attitude of a Christadelphian is submission to the existing powers, living peaceably with all men, except where the truth is concerned.
For the truth we are to contend earnestly, and the weapons of this warfare are mighty, through God, to the pulling down of strongholds; though not so mighty as they were in the days of Paul, when Christ's soldiers were armed with the powers of the spirit.
This is our warfare. We are not to touch the conflicts of the world. We are to pay tribute to whom tribute is due, custom to whom custom is due, fear to whom fear, honour to whom honour. We are to be the most peaceful of citizens, the most loyal of subjects, so far as deference to authority is concerned.
We are to submit to every ordinance of man, where it does not conflict with our duty to God.
Our submission, however, is not out of deference to human authority, but from obedience to divine law; we submit because God tells us to submit as a duty to Christ, not as a compliment to rulers.
Ambassador of the Coming Age, Nov 1868
18 Servants, be subject to your masters with all fear; not only to the good and gentle, but also to the froward.
... if a man is a servant (and cannot be otherwise), let him care not for it. It is but for a short time, and then freedom will come in a form that no one could attain by the highest effort and the highest success in this world. If he can be other than a servant, let him accept the liberty as an opportunity for greater good; but this will need discretion.
Bro Roberts - servants and masters
23 Who, when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he suffered, he threatened not; but committed himself to him that judgeth righteously:
Can Brethren be Constables and Soldiers?
The question is, Has Christ forbidden violence? Nothing is clearer. Peter says,
"He hath left us an example that we should tread in his steps" (2 Peter 2:21).
Christ himself said to his disciples:
"I have given you an example that ye should do as I have done to you" (John 13:15).
Now the example of Christ, as to the matter in hand is plain. The testimony is that he did no violence, neither was deceit found in his mouth (Isaiah 53:9). As Peter tells us,
"When he was reviled he reviled not again: when he suffered he threatened not, but committed himself to Him that judgeth righteously" (1 Peter 2:23).
Can we imagine Christ acting the special constable at Jerusalem at the bidding of the Scribes or magistrates; smiting and driving a turbulent mob on the plea of protecting life and property? If he once drove a crowd of market people out of the temple court,
"overthrowing the tables of the money changers and the seats of them that sold doves,"
it was not at the command of human authority but in the name of the Father, whose house of prayer had been transformed into a den of thieves. The law was yet in force, and Jesus as under the law (Gal. 4:5), was empowered to enforce its requirements as against his rebellious brethren, like Nehemiah, who drove out of the same place a similar class of people for a different offence (Neh. 13:7-31).
When the authority of God is re-established, the saints will take the sword of judgment, and be required to do the same work on a vaster and more effectual scale; but the question is what is their duty now, in the times of the Gentiles, while they are on probation for the kingdom of God. On this, the example of Christ points distinctly in the direction of non-resistance.
The Christadelphian, February, 1898
24 Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.
Brethren Thomas and Roberts taught that the laying of our sins upon Christ was not by mere type or symbol or imputation (like the animal sacrifices), but by an actual reality IN HIS BODY. That is, that our sins were "laid on him" in his being born of our condemned Sin's-flesh race: in his actual partaking of Sin's Flesh, the flesh in which the Diabolos, SIN, resided in every cell and fibre.
And that, having been so born into the condemned race, he himself inseparably from all his brethren - required to come under God's appointed sacrificial cleansing for the race. This is the reality and unity that connects us with him, and makes it righteously possible for his cleansing to purify us. Brethren Thomas and Roberts say:
"The flesh was the 'filthy garments' with which the Spirit Word was clothed: the 'iniquity of us all' that was laid upon him (Isa. 53: 6.)" -Eureka I, page 108
"If the principle of corruption had not pervaded the flesh of Jesus ... SIN could not have been condemned there, nor could he have borne our sins IN his own body." - Eureka I, page 203
"To be 'made sin' for others is to become flesh and blood." -Eureka I, page 247
"The 'filthy garments' of flesh, styled his 'iniquity' (Zech. 3:4)." -Eureka II, page 19
""Iniquities laid on him': this is a figurative description of what was literally done in God sending forth His Son, made of a woman (Adamic), made under the Law (Mosaic), to die under the combined curse . . . This was laid on Jesus in his being made of our nature." - Christadelphian, 1873, page 400
"The ceremonial imposition of sins upon the animals was the type. The real 'putting of sin' on the Lamb of God, in the bestowal of a prepared sin-body wherein to die, is the substance." -Christadelphian, 1873, page 462
Some quote a few statements by brother Roberts purportedly out of harmony with the vast bulk of his writings, as above illustrated. There are no contradictions. Objectors were always trying to get brother Roberts to say what would have happened, or what might have been required "if": IF certain facts about Christ were different; IF he had been entirely alone; IF he alone were to be saved.
This tack is not only unprofitable, but very mischievous and dangerous. Our wisdom is to take the complete Divine pattern of Truth as it is. To speculate on theoretical alternatives is presumption.
Christ cannot possibly be separated from his work for mankind. Immediately we separate him, even "for the sake of argument," we destroy the whole picture, and have nothing profitable to discuss. It is all or nothing: God's way in its completeness, the divine facts as they are - or no way at all.
Let us resolutely refuse to be drawn into the "what if" morass. Brother Roberts strenuously resisted this approach, but sometimes under pressure very guardedly yielded to it to help a confused questioner, or answer a pressing debater. Example:
"QUESTION: What would have been the consequences had Christ died a natural death?
"ANSWER: Had the will of God been so, his resurrection would have followed immediately, and our salvation equally secured. For the triumph lay here: that he rose after dying for sin. But a natural death would not have been the same trial of Christ's obedience ... It does not appear that the mode of death would have made any difference to the result as regards us, except in-so-far as might have borne on the question of Christ's obedience." - Christadelphian, 1873, page 322
Clearly it is all a matter of Divine appointment. IF God had appointed natural death for the cleansing of sin, it would have sufficed. The way He chose obviously served His purpose better. Note that brother Roberts correctly observes that in such a case, it would have sufficed for the salvation of ALL, not just Christ himself. But it is a profitless supposition. We are concerned with what God DID appoint as the way, not speculation about what He didn't.
Bro Growcott - Purifying of the heavenly