1 And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.

'The Greeks believed'. But some were subverted by 'the unbelieving Jews' v2.

The inworking of this mystery, or perverse teaching, showed itself very early in the history of the Christian Eve... we are told that certain who believed were not satisfied with the sufficiency of the simplicity which is in Christ for salvation.

The belief of "the things concerning the kingdom of the Deity and of the Name of Jesus Christ;" and the immersion of such a believer for salvation from the sins of the past-did not satisfy them. They required that Moses should be obeyed as well as Jesus; and that no gospel short of this would save any one:

"Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, and keep his law, ye cannot be saved. "

This was their perversion of the gospel, which Paul terms "another gospel," the preachers of which, though of celestial angelic origin, he pronounced "accursed."

But these accursed preachers did not regard the anathema of Paul. They did not desist from the sowing of tares; but continued to heap tradition upon tradition until the distinctiveness of the truth was lost in "the commandments and doctrines of men" (Col. 2:22); and the way of truth came to be evil spoken of. Many followed their pernicious ways. Nor were the apostles able to extinguish their evil influence.

Their reasonings and denunciations and threatenings, although sanctioned by the Spirit, failed to check or restrain the rapidly developing apostasy.

Whole houses were subverted from the faith by these mercenary, unruly and vain talkers and deceivers (Tit. 1: 11): and as error always progresses more rapidly than truth, the apostles found their influence waning, and the faithful falling into a minority; which steadily increased until there remained but few names who had not defiled their garments; and only a little strength to maintain the truth before the world (Apoc. 3:4,8).

Eureka 12.6


Why is "both together" inserted here? Clearly our attention is deliberately drawn to the fact, and our thoughts are directed to the tremendous value of companionship; and conversely, the tremendously added burden of standing alone.

The Master, we recall, sent out his disciples two and two (Luke 10:1; Mark 6:7) and this is the usual course in Scripture.

Of course, many of God's servants have laboured alone, as necessity has required. "I, even I only, am left" said the prophet Elijah, "and they seek my life to take it away"-and the prospect appalled him. Not solely the imminent danger, for that was not new, but the feeling of utter isolation and desertedness.

Paul was often reduced to this condition, or close to it:

"All they which are in Asia be turned away from me . . Demas hath forsaken me, having loved this present world. Only Luke is with me" (2 Tim. 1:15; 4:10-11).

Today all Christendom would be glad of the distinction of Paul's recognition, but during the period of his labours, many so-called "brethren" were ashamed or disdainful of his poverty, his unpretentious speech and demeanor, and his humiliating chains.

Doubtless they said he was a fool to be so outspoken when a little worldly wisdom and discretion would have so often eased his situation. But a few there were who perceived the true values, and for these Paul fervently thanked God. Without such, even he might have found the effort too great to sustain.

Jesus, too, during his supreme trial, was entirely alone-and not merely alone but forsaken by those he should have been able to count upon, but it was the will of God and he found God all-sufficient for his needs.

We can see, however, the value of the disciples to him during his ministry. True they were at times weak, often disappointing and sometimes quarrelsome. True too there was no comparison between his and their mental level and perception. These things must have often tried his patience sorely, but their earnest, intense, though dimly-perceiving devotion and companionship filled a void that might otherwise have been insufferable.

With the wise, the learned, the great men of his day, he had nothing in common. No fellow-feeling-no bond of communion. How often one looks, and looks in vain, for spiritual strength and help from those whose mental powers, it would seem, most qualify them to give it!

But we discover that it is the lowly, simple, earnest individual that seems to perceive things most clearly and who strikes a responsive chord within us. Why is it that those most capable and best informed in worldly matters speak with such limited perception about the things of God? The Scriptures tell us the answer-no one can advance very far along two divergent paths.

"The wisdom of this world is foolishness with God" (1 Cor. 3:19).

Bro Growcott - Through Much Tribulation

14 Which when the apostles, Barnabas and Paul, heard of, they rent their clothes, and ran in among the people, crying out,

Barnabas also was now an apostle (one sent forth). The apostles did not remain 12 in number. James the Lord's brother also became an apostle [apostolos Str. An ambassador of Messiah with power to perform miracles].

21 And when they had preached the gospel to that city, and had taught many, they returned again to Lystra, and to Iconium, and Antioch,

When they had taught many

or as the margin gives it, "had made many disciples . ." What was it that convinced these people of the truth of Paul's teaching when the great majority were hostile and unreceptive?

There was no natural advantage or incentive to belief in those days. It meant certain peril, persecution and ostracism from friend and kinsman. True, the apostles wrought miracles, but miracles of themselves do not convince. They did not convince the many others in these places who saw them performed. They invented other explanations for them.

But even in these outposts of the empire there were those who were receptive to revelation and instruction. Humble, simple people with reverent, God-seeking minds and a depth of spiritual perception which through the ages has distinguished the handful of chosen vessels.

To these, Paul's teaching was not foreign and unintelligible-it was the divine answer to a long-felt search and need. Their minds having long pondered the evidences of invisible divinity around them (as Paul describes in the opening chapters of his epistle to the Romans), they received with eager gratitude the God-provided explanation and solution.

These were no haphazard converts captivated by novelty and emotion. The present disadvantages of conversion would call for careful consideration and firm resolve. They had long sought for God if haply they might feel after Him and find Him (Acts 17:27). Therefore while the vast majority, as always, despised and ridiculed the uncouth and unattractive preacher, a few prepared vessels perceived and responded to the divine power of his message.

"As many as were ordained to eternal life, believed" (Acts 13:48).

Are we among such? Are we, in the sight of God as He scans the broad and turbulent expanse of human history, among those very, very few who stand out as His servants, His friends, His children?

If we are, it is wholly on the basis of a vast difference between ourselves and the world-not just a difference of detail or circumstance or interest-that is not sufficient to mark us out where myriads are forgotten. It requires an entirely different course of life. We must directly reverse most desires, must be completely submerged in devotion to Him. The "living sacrifice" that He demands can mean no less than this.

Does this condition exist within and among us? Upon this- and this only-depends our union with these devout disciples of so long ago. Outward appearance-profession-long familiarity, mean nothing . . absolutely nothing. God is no respecter of persons. His choice is made upon rigid and inflexible principles. The countless millions are allowed to die. The few who are chosen to life must be very, very different to justify the choice.

Many are called but very few are chosen. What a tragedy to confuse the call with the choice!

Let us, above all things, avoid this tragic error-the error of the Jews.

"We have Abraham for our father," they said (Matt. 3:9), "We are the chosen of God!"

No error could be more fatal.

"Think not to say to yourselves, We have Abraham to our father, for I say unto you that God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham."

That which they counted on so highly meant nothing in the sight of God. They thought to ride into the Kingdom on the strength of their position and affiliations. Can it be that we suffer from this same delusion to some degree, forgetting that God plays no favorites and that acceptance is strictly an individual affair and responsibility-that only an outstanding handful are chosen?

"These things" said Paul, "were written for our admonition, upon whom the ends of the ages are come . . . Wherefore," he continues, "let him that thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall." (1Cor 10:11-12)

Bro Growcott - Through Much Tribulation

27 And when they were come, and had gathered the ecclesia together, they rehearsed all that God had done with them, and how he had opened the door of faith unto the Gentiles.

The Preaching unto the Gentiles

Far back, God, had seen the necessity of choosing a family in whom he might concentrate his purpose, for he had proved that if his way were left to the general view of mankind, they would corrupt it continually. So he separated a seed, and from that time there arose two great scripturally defined racial divisions-Jews and Gentiles.

They became separated by a wall strong as adamant, reaching up to heaven, consisting of a theocratic constitution. None outside the barrier could break through or leap over. But there was a certain narrow aperture, circumcision, by which fleshly descent from Abraham was imputed, and by which a stranger could press his way and become a citizen of the Common wealth of Israel and a partaker of the benefits thereby accruing, and at the same time render himself liable to the laws of his adopted country. This in no way involved an entrance of Gentiles.

The Jewish nation were ignorantly proud of their exclusiveness, and while maintaining their separateness according to the letter of the law, bitterly abused the spirit of it. The time came when men of the divine stamp were fast dying out. The key of knowledge was stolen by the learned classes, and everything showed the necessity for God to interfere.

The "Schoolmaster" to whom Israel had been betrothed as to a husband had run his course, and like a decrepid old man waxed old and died a natural death, and it became a question whether Israel would be espoused to another or remain in widowhood.

As a nation, they had for long centuries been reducing the wisdom-breathing schoolmaster to a bare skeleton, and when Christ came as the embodiment of the schoolmaster's wisdom, he failed to be recognised by "his own;" "they received him not," so he looked elsewhere for his bride, and by the agency of his apostles, took out from among the Gentiles a people for his name. This element of the mystery needed to be conveyed by special revelation, which is not to be wondered at when we consider how unmistakably God had shown Israel, that they alone of all nations he knew.

That opportunity under the law by which a Gentile became a Jew was no longer available, as the law of ordinances had been taken out of the way, and even the apostles could not intuitively know that for the new commonwealth of Israel, the flesh profiteth nothing; or, to look at it from another point of view, that the act of putting on Christ involved a sharing with him a fleshly title as well as a spiritual title to citizenship of the new Jerusalem; that, being in Christ, a fleshly title would be imputed, so that when the Lord comes to enrol his people for the new Jerusalem constitution, he will count that each man was born there (Ps. 87:5, 6).

Thus circumcision of the flesh is imputed as well as circumcision of the heart. It has been said that it was a narrow aperture through which a stranger had to press his way into the commonwealth of Israel under the law, and so it was, for circumcision was an ordinance that few of the alien would honour. Like most of the divine workings, it was a base thing to mere carnal minds who, like Zipporah, could see nothing in it beyond a "bloody" deed.

We know that it was, among other things, a sign of belonging to the seed of Abraham, to whom belonged exclusively the promise, "I will give to thee, and thy seed after thee, all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession," and only such (circumcised ones) were eligible for the covenant made at Sinai. Now, we cannot make a hard and fast line between the law of Moses and the law of Christ; they are one, as the flower and its roots are one.

We cannot, as some do, put baptism as a substitute for circumcision: it is really a way of getting at circumcision of both flesh and heart, and by conforming to this apostolic mode of circumcision, we find ourselves in the "narrow way," agonising through the "strait gate" into the new Commonwealth of Israel, and as we keep in "the way," the wall that separates Gentile from Jew becomes more distinct, higher, and stronger, and, when we emerge on the other side, it will be found that, in "the way," we lost our Gentilism and put on the likeness of the Jew, so that it shall be said,

"This and that man was born in Zion" (Ps. 87:5). Thus ends the mystery of God manifest in flesh . . . preached unto the Gentiles. Thus are we brought to understand "the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow."

Perhaps the subject is not quite complete without bringing to mind the fact that many Jews were obedient to the faith by baptism, and why? Because they had forfeited their claims to the promises through disobedience, and were in this sense no better off than the Gentiles who never had a claim. Getting into Christ was as necessary for one as the other.

On the one hand, the Jews became freely restored to the Abrahamic claim, while on the other, the Gentiles receive it as a free gift-

a Sister.

The Christadelphian, June 1886