1 TIMOTHY 6


2 And they that have believing masters, let them not despise them, because they are brethren; but rather do them service, because they are faithful and beloved, partakers of the benefit. These things teach and exhort.

3 If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness;

'If any man teach otherwise...'

By what means shall a community, based on the truth, preserve the truth in purity in its midst?

Obviously by the means indicated by Paul and John, that is, by exacting of all who are in it an implicit adherence to the things, facts, principles, points, tenets, or whatever else they may be called, which go to make up the truth in its entirety and by refusing to associate with those who oppose or refuse to endorse any of its elements.

The ecclesia is not a place for argument; it is for worship in agreement. When a man requires to be argued with, his natural place is outside, and if he will not go outside, separation must be enforced by withdrawal on the part of the rest.

Division is the inevitable concomitant of an uncompromising adherence to the truth. Peace purchased at the cost of compromise is doubly dangerous.

The truth is the standard and must alone be allowed to rule.

Bro Roberts - 'Contending for the Faith'



Those who are indifferent can easily afford to ignore disagreement, and to preach cordially of the virtue of "agreeing to differ." This is no characteristic of the Ecclesia of the Living God. It contends for the Faith once delivered to the saints, and obeys Paul's command to "turn away" from the perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds.

Bro Roberts



4 He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings,

We know, by experience, how readily "fellows of the baser sort," pretending to great conscientiousness, and zeal for religion, busy themselves, for the promotion of their own wicked purposes, in defaming and bearing false witness against men whose lives are devoted to the propagation and defense of the truth.

Eureka 13.13.



...a quiet attendance on the common occupations of life is part of the life of a saint. Upon this it may be asked, Wherein does the life of a brother of Christ differ from the life of an industrious decent sinner? We have the answer in the motive power of a saint, and the objects to which he applies the result of his labour. Paul defines the first in saying.

"Whatsoever ye do, do it heartily as to the Lord, and not unto men, serving the Lord Christ."

The whole economy of a true brother's life is on this foundation, so that, with him or her, affairs of business or the house are a channel of service to the Lord. They are attended to in the spirit of service to Christ. But again it may be asked, how does this performance of them—say, attending to business for a livelihood or having a care of the household for the comfort and health of those who are in it—how does a saint's attendance on these things differ practically from the decent neighbourly managing creature of the present world?

The answer is to be found in the difference of the underlying motive and the ultimate object for which they are performed. In the case of a person living without God and without hope, business and the house are looked after for present gratification and well-being, without reference to Him by whom all things consist.

God is not in all their thoughts. House and family and business are all in all. A saint, on the contrary, attends to those things as part of a life-service to God. Then there is this great difference:

"Having food and raiment." the saint is "therewith content."—(1 Tim. 6:8.)

He does not aim to be rich, knowing that "they that will be rich fall into many foolish and hurtful lusts that drown men in destruction and perdition."—(Ibid.)

If he is industrious and scheming in business, it is not that he may lay up treasure on earth, but that he may have to give to them that need (Eph. 4:28), and wherewith to exereise the part of a "good steward of the manifold grace of God" (1 Pet. 4:10), that being faithful in the "few things" of "uncertain riches" (Matt. 25:21; 1 Tim. 6:18), he may be afterwards worthy to share in that higher trust which the Lord will extend to his faithful servants at his coming in power and great glory.—(Luke 19:17.)

Not that all who profess the name of Christ carry out these principles, but these are the principles of the household, and the principles upon which the house will be judged at last, without respect of persons. The maxims of carnal prudence will be at a discount when the Lord has returned. Faith is the foundation principle of the house of God, and without faith it is impossible to please Him. Therefore, let every man see to it while the account is still running.

Sunday Morning 62

The Christadelphian, 1875



9 But they that will be rich fall into temptation and a snare, and into many foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and perdition.

TO engross ourselves in business under the plea of making money to assist the truth, is dangerous. To do so at the expense of actual duty is sinful. God could easily divert the wealth of the whole world into the channels of the truth if He so willed But He does not, though He will at the right time.

For the present, He has a different work, that of preparing men for His glorious Kingdom. In this work we can become co-workers with Him. We are to regard ourselves as strangers and pilgrims, to esteem riches as a snare (1 Tim. 6:9), and prosperity as dangerous (Prov. 30:8, 9).

Our aim should be to serve God without distraction: an aim not compatible with unnecessarily involving ourselves in the cares and anxieties of commercial life. No amount of money made and applied to the service of the truth will excuse from certain clearly revealed duties, to wit, daily reading, attendance at the meetings, exhorting one another, proclaiming the word, visiting the sick, etc., etc.

Bro AT Jannaway

The Christadelphian, Mar 1888



15 Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;

The elohal superintendence of the affairs of the "thrones, dominions, principalities, and powers" of the world, is clearly revealed in the book of Daniel. In the fourth chapter of this prophet it is declared that the matter set forth therein was revealed to teach

"the living that the Highest One is the ruler in the kingdom of men, and that He giveth it to him whom He shall please, and sets up over it the lowest of men."

Besides this it shows, that though the ruler or Lord, He does not administer the government alone, but associates with Himself others, styled irin "watchers," who are, like Himself, kaddishin, "Holy Ones."

...Our Elohim shall come and not keep silence; a fire before His (Yahweh's) faces (the Elohim) shall devour; and around Him it is very tempestuous.

Phanerosis - Angelic Supervision Of World Events



16 Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen.

Immortality, in an underived sense, belongs only to God; He alone is naturally deathless and inherently immortal.

The Christadelphian, Mar 1873



Who only hath immortality

The Arch-Elohim said that the man had become LIKE one of themselves in the matter of knowing good and evil. This also is an argument for his likeness to a plurality of persons; and it further shews that the Elohim were once in a condition similar to man after he had transgressed.

The Lord of the Elohim himself declares that they also had been experimentally sensible of evil, for this is the idea expressed by the Hebrew word YADA, to know, which the LXX translate by eidew, eideo. In short, it is credible that none of the Elohim of the Only Potentate's dominion were created immortal, but earthly, or animal, like Adam.

The Eternal King is the only Being who is originally immortal in any sense, hence it is written that He "only hath immortality." The immortality of all other intelligences is derived from Him as a reward for the "obedience of faith."

Just men at the resurrection of the First Fruits will be equal to the Elohim. Shall we say that these "Morning Stars and Sons of God" did not attain to the spiritual nature by a progression similar to man, seeing that He "who was made so much better than they," even Jesus, the "Bright and the Morning Star," was made perfect through sufferings?"

Have they had no trials to endure, no probation to pass through for the refining of their faith as gold is tried? It is credible, rather, that they were once animal men of other spheres; that in a former state they were "made subject to vanity not willingly;" that while in the flesh they believed and obeyed God with the self-sacrificing disposition afterwards evinced by Abraham; that their faith was counted to them for righteousness; that they succumbed to death as mortal men; that they rose from the dead, and so attained to incorruptibility and immortality as the Elohim of the Invisible God.

Our mundane system is but the pattern of things in other worlds, which may, ere this, have attained to that perfection which awaits the earth, and probably an illustration of what may even now obtain in other planets where the inhabitants have not yet progressed beyond the animal and probationary era of their history.

Our angels, or Elohim, those I mean of the heavenly hosts to whose superintendence terrestrial affairs are consigned until the Lord Jesus shall assume the reins of government -- not all the Elohim, but those of them related to us -- "always behold the face of God," and minister His will towards the sons of men. This is their glory -- a part of their reward. He sent them to form and fill the earth with living souls. They executed their commission according to His purpose.

Behold, then, the consummation. Mortal and corruptible beings like ourselves become Elohim, mighty in strength and framers of new worlds, of which the planet we inhabit, even in its present state, is a grand and glorious specimen.

"Behold," says Jesus, once an infant at the breast, powerless in death, but now endued with all power, "I make all things new." He will educe, from the things which exist, a new and magnificent world as a fit and appropriate habitation for His companions, redeemed by His blood from the sons of men. This is the destiny set before those who shall become "equal to the angels" by a resurrection to eternal life.

Elpis Israel 1.6.



It is the "Father-Spirit" that Paul refers to in 1 Tim. 6:16, whom no man hath seen in His unveiled splendour. Veiled in flesh, "the Vail of the Covering" (Exodus 35:12): he that discerneth him who spoke to Philip, "saw the Father" (John 14:9; 12:45). But, veiled or unveiled, the Father-Spirit is substantial. Speaking of the Unveiled Father-Spirit, Paul says in Heb. 1:2, 3, that the Son is the Character of his Hypostasis, rendered, in the common version, "express image of his person."

The Son is the character or exact representation, and the Father is the hypostasis. In reference to the former, the Father says, in Zech 3:9:

"Upon One Stone there shall be Seven Eyes; behold I will engrave the graving thereof (that is, of the stone), saith He who shall be hosts."

The graving engraved on the stone is termed, in Greek, character, an impress wrought into a substance after some archetype or pattern. The archetype is the hypostasis, so that hypostasis is the basis or foundation of character; wherefore the same apostle in Col. 1:15, styles the character engraved the "Image" of Theos the Invisible (eikon tou Theou tou aoratou).

Phanerosis - One Deity in Multiplicity



Father dwelling in light from whom emanates the Spirit of His own substance, filling all space, and constituting the basis of all creative developments, and yet with which he is essentially one, and by it, consequently fills heaven and earth in consciousness and power... The Spirit of God fills the universe, and all things exist by means of it. Without it, there is no power of any kind.

Bro Roberts TC THE OPERATIONS OF THE DEITY

The Christadelphian, May 1870. p143-151


Paul affirms the plurality of Gods, and Moses shows that they existed before the creation of man.

But then, both Paul and Moses teach that there is One who is surpreme over them all. This is AIL, who created them, and who is alone to be an object of adoration, not with the blank amazement of superstition but of an adoration in an earnest belief of His promises, and willing and loving obedience to His commands. Of this supreme God it is that Paul and Jesus say: "There is none other God but one." He is the only Head of the universe, who will permit none to take precedence of himself in the affection and adoration of His creatures.

He does not, however, manifest Himself to all the intelligences who reside in the sun, moon, stars and earth, through the same medium. To us on earth, He presents Himself, not through Gabriel, but through Jesus as the medium of manifestation -- incipient manifestation, for the manifestation is not yet complete --

"To us there is but one God the Father out of whom are all things and we for Him; and one Lord Jesus Anointed, on account of whom are all things, and we through him."

Down to the third verse of the second chapter of Genesis, the creation of all things is affirmed of "God", that is of Elohim or Gods. But from the fourth verse to the end of the third chapter, where the divine power is mentioned, it is not simply "God" but "Lord God", that is Yahweh Elohim. The common version would merely indicate by prefixing Lord to God, that the Lord God was the supreme God. But if this were admitted, we should be unable to reconcile the saying of John, and Jesus, and Paul, who all declare that "no man hath seen God at any time" (John 1:18; 6:46; 1 Tim. 6: 16).

Now Adam and Eve saw and conversed with the Lord God; and multitudes saw Jesus. But we remark that "Lord God" is not used by Moses to express POWER IN-CREATE UNVEILED, or Ail; but as a word-combination synonymous with "Spirit of God" of Gen. 1:2, or literally Ruach Elohim, spirit of Gods or mighty ones -- the "One Spirit" veiled in the mighty ones through whom He made all that was made.

Phanerosis - The Memorial Name

àImmortality is neither innate nor disembodied. "The Deity only hath it," Paul says; and he only bestows it upon obedient believers of the truth as it is in the Jesus he preached; and that bestowal is upon men and women bodily existing; and by clothing their bodies with incorruptibility and deathlessness after resurrection from among the dead.

Eureka 9.4.11.



Immortality

The testimony of Scripture concerning it.

"God only hath immortality."—1 Tim. 6:16.

"When this mortal shall have put on immortality."—1 Cor. 15:54.

"Immortality," athanasia, is a word signifying deathlessness; hence we are taught that the only deathless being in the universe is "the Incorruptible God," ho aphthartos theos,

"dwelling in the light, whom no man hath seen, nor can see."

The Invisible God was never deathful nor subject to death; but all other intelligences of the universe have, or will be subjected to death, or to something equivalent to it. Their immortality is bestowed at some time subsequent to death; but His, who is the Life of the Universe, is underived; for He is from everlasting to everlasting deathless.

The testimony that "God only hath deathlessness," teaches that the immortality or deathlessness of men and angels dates from a change or resurrection from the death state.

At this crisis their "mortal body" puts on deathlessness, so that thenceforth "they die no more." To constitute them deathless their bodies must become "incorruptible"—aphtharsia; for a corruptible body cannot be deathless or immortal.

Aphtharsia is the substratum of Athanasia; that is, Incorruptibility is the underlay of Immortality. Incorruptibility is not immortality; but without incorruptibility, immortality cannot be. Hence Immortality is something more than incorruptibility. It is "Life and Incorruptibility"—zoe kai aphtharsia—combined.

Incorruptibility has regard to physical quality of body, which may be living or inanimate. A diamond may represent an incorruptible body; but because incorruptible, it is not therefore living or deathless. An immortal body, however, is necessarily an incorruptible body; because immortality cannot be without incorruptibility.

God though "a spirit" is also a body; for he is styled "the incorruptible God," and incorruptibility is scripturally affirmed of body. Immortality is life manifested through an incorruptible body; and is the opposite to mortality, which is life manifested through a corruptible body. Such is the immortality brought to light by Jesus in the gospel of the kingdom—"mortality swallowed up of life."

The supposition of deathliness and deathlessness co-existing in the same body, or of an "immortal soul" in mortal flesh, is pagan foolishness; and implies ignorance of "the truth as it is in Jesus." It is the Spirit of God that makes alive; the flesh profiteth nothing.79 Hereditary immortality is a fiction of the carnal mind, at once revolting to reason and the word of God.

Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come, May 1851



The respectable and the learned are surrounded with the views and influences from the very cradle, which bring men into bondage to the traditions and practices of the world, and withhold them from the enlightening power of the testimony of God.

The poor are no better off so far as the positive tendency of their surroundings is concerned; but in their poverty, they are at least free from some of the impediments that beset the path of the well-to-do, and their minds are more flexible to the divine bent than where riches foster pride and harden the heart.

Thirteen lectures on the apocalypse



As soon as a man gets a large sum, his absorbing idea is how to make it more, and when he gets that more, he still enlarges his schemes that he may enrich himself indefinitely. The more he gets, the more scrubby he becomes. The idea of saving takes possession of his mind, and paralyses every noble impulse and defiles, with the ungraciousness of stinginess, even the little acts of goodness he squeezes, with much effort, out of his dry soul.

It is the case of the man with the barns over again. The same story is told in every generation. Men lay up treasure for themselves but are not rich towards God. They spend little or nothing for him. They have no faith in laying up a store in heaven against the time to come; and, at last, in every case, comes the event of the terrible words,

"Thou fool, this night is thy soul required of thee;"

and the fool dies and is laid in the bed of corruption for the worms to feed sweetly on him, while his precious hoard is squandered by other hands.

The only wise, wholesome, and scriptural policy is the one prescribed by Peter when he says,

"As every one hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good stewards of the manifold grace of God."

Christ makes our faithfulness in this matter the measure of our fitness for position in his kingdom, saying,

"If ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches?"—(Luke 16:11.)

These lessons may be disregarded now, and men may slide along in the security of their selfish prudences, regardless of the voice of Christ commanding a God-like course; but the day is near when these commandments will ring in their ears with a terrible and appalling force.

Christ comes to render to every man according to his work, of which he will judge by the standard of his own word. When the dead awake, we shall know he is in the earth, and the living will tremble who have lived in pleasure and been wanton, and nursed their fattening hearts for the day of slaughter, while the poor among men, and the rich, who have given themselves a living sacrifice to God, will rejoice in the Holy One of Israel, saying,

"Lo, this is our God: we have waited for Him; we will be glad and rejoice in His salvation."

—Editor.

Sunday Morning 62

The Christadelphian, 1875



19 Laying up in store for themselves a good foundation against the time to come, that they may lay hold on eternal life.

Christ means to say that as men cannot in the nature of things retain the wealth they have,—seeing they are bound to part company when death comes, the course of wisdom is to so use them that when the day of reckoning comes, everlasting results may come from them instead of results of destruction, which are the usual results, for, as he says,

"How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the Kingdom of God."

The Christadelphian, July 1898



20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:

Committed to thy Trust

We are prepared to accept "the co-operation of the intelligence of scripturally-enlightened brethren and sisters," in getting up the Ambassador. We desire such co-operation, and as a matter of fact, we avail ourselves of it, so far as it is within reach in a useful form; but this policy must be kept strictly subordinate to the interests of the truth, the interest of the reader, and the interest of the Ambassador.

It would not be conducive to any of these interests to publish everything that sincerity may put on paper. Sincerity is sometimes ignorant, and sometimes unable to use itself to the profit of others. We are obliged to exercise the degree of supervision, necessary occasionally to hold back the productions of such a state of mind—productions written from the best of motives, but too feeble to be effective for good, too flimsy and hypercritical to be useful, or too narrow (and perhaps a little mistaken) in the apprehension of the subject dealt with, to be profitable.

The Ambassador of the Coming Age, Aug 1867. p227


The Oriental Philosophy

Orientalism is denominated, not philosophy, but "science falsely so called," by Paul in his letter to Timothy. The votaries of it were numerous in Persia, Syria, Chaldea, and Egypt. Of this science there were many sects. It has been thought worthy of remark, that, while,

"the Greek and Roman sects of philosophy were much divided about the first principles of science, all the sects of the oriental science deduced their tenets from one fundamental principle."

This science supposed that,

"The origin of evils, with which the universe abounds, was to be found not in God, whom they viewed as essentially good and benevolent; but as there was nothing beyond or without the Deity but matter, therefore matter is the centre and source of all evil, and vice. That matter was eternal and derived its present form, not from the will of the supreme God, but from the creating power of some inferior intelligence, to whom the world and its inhabitants owed their existence.

Some imagined two eternal principles from whence all things proceeded, the one presiding over light, and the other over matter; and by their perpetual conflict, explained the mixture of good and evil that appears in the universe.

Others maintained that the being who presided over matter was not an eternal principle, but a subordinate intelligence, one of those whom the supreme God produced from himself. They supposed that this being was moved by a sudden impulse to reduce to order the rude mass of matter and to create the human race.

A third sort fell upon another system, and said there was a Triple Divine Principle or a triumvirate in which the Supreme Deity was distinguished from the material, and from the creator of this world. The Supreme Being they supposed to be a radiant light, most pure, different from the immensity of space, called the Pleroma.

The eternal nature, having dwelt long in solitude, produced from itself two minds of a different sex, which resembled the Supreme Parent in the most perfect manner. In process of time, from these two proceeded a celestial family. These were called Eons. How many of these there were was not decided. The creator of this world they styled Demiurgus.

"Man they considered a compound of terrestrial and celestial nature; of the evil principle of matter, and of divinity. Those who subdue the evil principle that propels them to sin against the Supreme, ascend directly to the Pleroma: those yielding to the evil principle shall be sent after death into other bodies, until they awake from their sinful lethargy.

In the end, the Supreme God shall come forth victorious, and, having delivered from their servitude the greatest part of those enslaved souls, shall dissolve the frame of the visible world, and involve it in ruin. After this primitive tranquility will be restored in the universe, and God shall reign with happy spirits in undisturbed felicity through endless ages.

Such is a brief outline of the opinions current among the Gentiles elaborated by the thinking of the flesh, darkened by ignorance of the divine testimony, and sin, in the last days of the Mosaic world. It was a hash, well and truly designated by Paul, "philosophy and vain deceit," vain babbling and oppositions of science, falsely so called."

No one professing the faith, who received them in whole or in part, could avoid being spoiled by them. It was the commingling of these fleshly thinkings with the word of God that corrupted the faith of Israel: and afterward the doctrine of the apostles delivered to both Jews and Gentiles.

They faithfully discharged their mission, but "false brethren" who "had pleasure in unrighteousness," who desired to popularize the truth, that they might be zealously affected by the simpletons they deceived, mixed it up with these crotchets of the flesh, and out of the offensive mixture presented to the world the mess of stuff "the spirit spued out of his mouth," in the early part of the fourth century.—Revelations 3:16.

Herald of the Kingdom and Age to Come, Apr 1861